Trump Calls Out the Obvious: Only Cheaters Oppose Voter ID
The SAVE America Act cleared its first Senate hurdle while Democrats vote against basic election security.
The SAVE America Act cleared its first Senate hurdle this week with a 51-48 vote to begin debate, and President Trump didn't mince words about what's really at stake.
"The only people who would want not to have that are people that want to cheat," Trump said during remarks with Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin. "It's very, very simple. We can't let that happen."
Here's the thing nobody's talking about: who exactly is fighting against requiring proof of citizenship to vote in American elections?
The Bill Everyone Should Want
The SAVE America Act does two basic things that should be common sense:
Requires proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections
Mandates voter identification at the polls
If you live in America, you need an ID to buy beer, get on a plane, or pick up a prescription. But somehow requiring an ID to vote is controversial?
Trump called mail-in voting "corrupt as hell" and pointed out that "we're the only country in the world that does it that way." When the president of the United States has to explain why proving you're a citizen should be required to vote in American elections, we've lost the plot.
The Vote That Tells You Everything
The Senate vote breakdown reveals exactly where everyone stands:
Republicans: 50 out of 51 voted to advance the bill
Democrats: All 48 voted against even *debating* it
The lone GOP defector: Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
Because of course it was.
Notice what Democrats aren't saying. They're not arguing that noncitizen voting is good for America. They're not making the case that verification is bad policy. Instead, they claim existing laws already prohibit noncitizens from voting.
Translation: they don't want verification because verification works.
What This Really Means
Your tax dollars fund elections. Your voice gets diluted if people who shouldn't be voting are voting. And right now, the system operates on the honor system in too many places.
Think about that for a second. We have background checks to buy guns, but asking someone to prove they're a citizen before they vote for the people who make laws about guns? That's apparently too much to ask.
The bill also tackles two other issues Trump mentioned: "No men in women's sports" and "no transgender mutilation of our children." According to the president, these positions poll at 99% and 98% respectively.
When you're on the side of 98% of Americans and still getting pushback from Democrats, what does that tell you about who they're really representing?
The Path Forward
Here's where it gets interesting. The bill needs 60 votes for final passage, which means Republicans need some Democrats to break ranks.
That's not happening.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune will eventually file to end debate and force the final vote. Democrats will vote in lockstep against it. Then they'll go back to their districts and pretend they support election integrity while they vote against the most basic election security measures.
The question isn't whether this bill should pass. The question is why anyone would vote against it.
What You Can Do
If you live in a state with a Democrat senator, they're about to vote against requiring citizenship proof to vote in your elections. Call their office. Ask them to explain why.
If your senator is a Republican, make sure they know you're watching. Lisa Murkowski already showed there's at least one GOP vote willing to abandon basic election security.
Your senator works for you. Make sure they know it.
The Bottom Line
President Trump is right, and everyone knows it. The only people who benefit from unverified elections are people who can't win verified ones.
That's the cost of letting the foxes guard the henhouse. The question is simple: are you going to fight for this, or let it die so politicians can pretend they tried?
---
Further Reading: